Kathmandu : Protests have started from within the ruling party after the government recommended an ordinance to form another party if the party has 20 percent members in the Central Committee or the parliamentary party. UML has warned to protest strongly after receiving the needle for the ordinance. Even some leaders in favor of Madhav Nepal have protested against the ordinance saying that it would weaken the political system. Leader Gokarna Bista, who was on Madhav Nepal’s side earlier but has been close to Oli lately, has said that the ordinance should be withdrawn.
Shekhar Koirala, an influential leader of the ruling Nepali Congress, has opposed the ordinance on political parties.

The cabinet meeting held in Baluwatar today had decided to bring an ordinance to split the party if it has 20 percent in the Central Committee or the parliamentary party.

Although the ordinance on political parties may have been brought to facilitate the running of the government, Koirala has opposed it.

“The ordinance on political parties may have been introduced to facilitate the running of the government, but the ordinance does not support the idea of ​​running the state,” Koirala tweeted today. This mistake was made by the Prime Minister, this is not the culture of the Congress. ‘

Legal practitioners opposed to the Oli government have also expressed outrage over the ordinance.
Former Supreme Court Justice Balram KC remarked that the meaning of change is over. “What KP Sharma Oli did, Sher Bahadur Deuba repeated the same trend,” he said. “It was not good for the rule of law.”
He said that this step of the government has led the parties to collapse the constitution. “The rule of law is deteriorating. “The law has been broken,” he said.

Advocate Bhimarjun Acharya said that the same thing was done wrong by the Oli government yesterday and not right by the Deuba government today. “The constitution does not accept the existence of an ordinance except in exceptional and urgent circumstances,” he said.
Advocate Omprakash Aryal said that this was a political issue but it was not possible to bring a law for any one party only. “The constitution gives us the right to bring in ordinances if there is an urgent need for any work,” Aryal said. He has more questions.

Stating that it was wrong for the parties to talk about the rule of law, he said that it was wrong to try to get the ordinance passed one after the other.
Himal Khabar publisher Kanak Mani Dixit, on the other hand, said that all these were designed by Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda in the name of opposing the ordinance.